Zoning petition not ready for a Town Meeting vote

Warrant article 46 proposes a significant, large-scale, and multi-faceted development that should not be rushed into existence without proper vetting, transparency, and public process.

We welcome New England Deaconess as the new owner of the 12-acre parcel near Old Marlboro Road and ORNAC, and we have expressed that support — along with many of our neighbors — at every public and private meeting regarding their proposed zoning overlay. 

However, that support does not extend to approving a sweeping rezoning effort without the careful planning such a complex project demands.

This proposal represents a dramatic shift in this land use — a zoning framework that does not currently exist in Acton. The implications are far-reaching (many positive), and it is being introduced not through the town Planning Board, as is typical and appropriate for projects of this magnitude, but through a citizen’s petition. That is concerning.

The scope of this development warrants a thorough and deliberate public planning process. Yet discussions with the neighborhood only began two months ago. Why, then, is this proposal being fast-tracked to a vote at the June Town Meeting?

The residents of Old Marlboro Road, whose homes abut the property, have serious and legitimate concerns about what this proposed language would allow. Ours is a residential neighborhood, and we want to ensure that any development on this parcel keeps it as such. Each meeting with the Deaconess team has revealed evolving and shifting plans — hardly the mark of a proposal ready for final approval.

This concept is not ready. It needs more time, more clarity, and more public input. The Planning Board should be leading this process, ensuring a thoughtful, transparent approach — not bypassed in favor of an expedited citizen petition. 

This is an important project for Acton; let’s get it right. 

Jennifer and Ed Hurley-Wales

Old Marlboro Road